TARDIGRADE KEY

Tag: Superfamily Hypsibioidea

Sarascon

Genus description from Guil et al. 2014: “The buccopharyngeal apparatus […] of the Parascon type (sensu Pilato & Binda, 2010), i.e. a buccal tube that is rigid along the entire length, lacking a spiral thickening, ventral lamina, and a thickening (goccia) that is typically found between the rigid and flexible portions of the buccopharyngeal tube […]

Platicrista

Genus description from Pilato 1987: “The bucco-pharyngeal apparatus is of the Diphascon model with the apophyses for the insertion of the muscles of the stylets in the shape of ‘very wide and flat ridges’; they are symmetrical with respect to the frontal plane; and with the caudal processes poorly developed and pointing sideways; the furcae have the […]

Parascon

Genus description from Pilato & Binda 1987: “Unghie di tipo Hypsibius. L’apparato bucco-faringeo, sprovvisto di sbarretta di rinforzo, non è del tipico modello Diphascon perché il tubo è rigido per tutta la sua lunghezza e non suddiviso in una porzione anteriore rigida ed una posteriore flessibile, e la porzione posteriore ai supporti degli stiletti è sprovvista di ispessimento […]

Mesocrista

Genus description from Pilato 1987: “The bucco-pharyngeal apparatus is of the Diphascon model with the apophyses for the insertion of the muscles of the stylets in the shape of ‘wide and flat ridges’; they are symmetrical with respect to the frontal plane and with the caudal processes well developed and pointing backwards and sideways; the furcae have […]

Itaquascon

Genus description from Pilato 1997: “Claws of the Hypsibius-type; bucco-pharyngeal tube subdivided into an anterior, rigid portion (buccal tube) and a posterior, flexible portion (pharyngeal tube) provided with a spiral thickening. Stylet supports present. Buccal tube, without ventral lamina, clearly longer than the apophyses for the insertion of the muscles of the stylets. Apophyses for the […]

Bindius

Genus description from Pilato 2009: “Claws of Hypsibius type. The bucco-pharyngeal apparatus […] is a variant of the Diphascon model (Pilato & Binda, 1983): the bucco-pharyngeal tube is subdivided into a rigid buccal tube and a flexible pharyngeal tube with a spiral thickening; buccal tube without ventral lamina. The dorsal and ventral apophyses for the insertion of the stylet […]

Astatumen

Genus description from Pilato 1997: “Claws of the Hypsibius-type; bucco-pharyngeal tube subdivided into an anterior, rigid portion (buccal tube) and a posterior, flexible portion (pharyngeal tube) provided with a spiral thickening. Stylet supports absent. Buccal tube, without ventral lamina, very short (only as long as the apophyses for the insertion of the muscles of the stylets). […]

Ramazzottius

Genus description from Binda & Pilato 1986: “Hypsibiidae con unghie di tipo oberhaeuseri; le due diplounghie di ciascuna zampa molto diverse fra loro; apparato bucco-faringeo costruito secondo il modello Hypsibius con tubo boccale rigido e apofisi per l’inserzione dei muscoli degli stiletti ‘ad uncino smussato’ e asimmetriche rispetto al piano frontale; è presente un organo sensoriale ellittico dorsolaterale […]

Hebesuncus

Genus description from Pilato 1987: “The bucco-pharyngeal apparatus is of the Diphascon model with the apophyses for the insertion of the muscles of the stylets in the shape of a ‘blunt hook’; the dorsal hook is different in shape and size from the ventral one with consequent asymmetry with respect to the frontal plane; the caudal processes […]

Cryoconicus

Genus description from Zawierucha et al. 2018: “Juveniles light-brown, adults intensely dark-brown. Peribuccal lamellae and papulae absent. Buccal apparatus of the Ramazzottius type, with asymmetrical apophyses for the insertion of the stylet muscles and two macroplacoids; microplacoid and septulum absent. Claws of the Ramazzottius type, but without accessory points. The posterior primary branch almost uniform in diameter from the base to […]

Armoured (dorsal) plates?

Pharyngeal tube flexible?

Note: in a tardigrade with snout extended, the flex of the pharyngeal tube may not be obvious.

Images from Pilato G, Binda MG. 2010. Definition of families, subfamilies, genera, and subgenera of the Eutardigrada, and keys to their identification. Zootaxa. 2404: 1-54.

Claw type

tenuis: With stalk, a long common tract formed by the joined primary & secondary branches, and distal sections of both the secondary branch – shorter than the primary – and primary branch forming almost a right angle.
Insuetifurca: Modified hufelandi: Basal section subdivided into a very short stem & a large distal portion.
hufelandi: Primary & secondary branches rigidly joined, forming an acute angle, with variable but long common basal tract and cylindrical stalk.
Dactylobiotus: Basal section a trapezoidal lamina; secondary branch clearly shorter than primary and inserted near the base of the latter; the two branches form an almost right angle.
Mesobiotus: Primary & secondary branches rigidly joined, forming acute angle, with variable but long common basal tract with internal septum defining a distal part, with cylindrical stalk. Often very prominent, strong accessory point on primary.
Murrayon: Basal section a trapezoidal lamina; primary & secondary branches joined to each other for a very short portion and form an acute angle.
Xerobiotus: Whole double claw equally sclerified; basal section not subdivided into a basal stem & distinct distal portion; no separating septa present; primary & secondary branches rigidly joined forming an acute angle.
Hypsibius: Secondary branch forming a continuous curve with its basal tract; in external claws the primary branch connected to the basal tract with a flexible part while the inner claw is rigid.
Ramazzottius: External claws with basal section longer than the secondary branch; primary branch very long and slender and connected to basal tract with an evident, thin, flexible tract; internal claws short & stout, rigid.
Ramajendas: External claws similar to Hypsibius type with extremely long and slender primary branch; internal claw similar to Isohypsibius type.
Microhypsibius: Small, rigid, with an evident thin basal tract continuous with the primary branch; secondary branch rigidly joined to the primary branch at a distance from the base of the claw.
Calohypsibius: Small, rigid, in frontal view with a base as large as the sum of the primary and secondary branch widths, without a suture between the two branches.
Hexapodibius: Very short, without common basal tract, with base as large as the sum of the primary and secondary branches.
Isohypsibius: Secondary branch inserted perpendicularly on the claw basal tract.
Eremobiotus: Isohypsibius-type very modified with two branches of each claw joined to one another for a long portion of their length constituting a large common tract from which the two distal tracts diverge forming an angle of almost 180°.
Bertolanius: Subdivided into three distinct sections: basal section, secondary branch and primary branch (rigidly joined to the secondary branch), one on top of the other and separated by septa; the angles between the main and secondary branch different in external and internal claws – and acute angle (about 45°) is formed by the external claw, and an almost right angle (about 80°) by the internal claw; internal claws can rotate on their base up to 180°.
Vladimirobius: external at least 2x length of internal (measured from base of claw), internal very wide at the junction of primary and secondary branches, short and thin basal part, primary branches with very prominent gibbosity-like projection near the junction of primary and secondary branches; external very thin with long basal part; accessory points of both claws very near to end of primary branch.
Calcarobiotus: Basal section, with or without basal spurs, subdivided into a thin flexible stem & a wide distal section in the shape of an upside-down triangle distally delmited by a septum; primary & secondary branches similar in shape & size.
Macroversum: Basal section subdivided into a thin, flexible, stem and distal portion not very sclerotized; primary & secondary branches connected to each other for a short portion and form an almost right angle.

Number of lateral alae

Hansen, J.G. & Kristensen, R.M. (2021) A new genus and five new species of the subfamily Florarctinae (Tardigrada, Arthrotardigrada). European Journal of Taxonomy, 762, 149-184.

Epicuticle

Left image: Anguas-Escalante, A., De Jesús Navarrete, A., Demilio, E., Pérez-Pech, W.A. & Hansen, J.G. (2020). A new species of Tardigrada from a Caribbean reef lagoon, Florarctus yucatanensis sp. nov. (Halechiniscidae: Florarctinae). Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 62, 377-385.

Right image: Fontoura, P., Bartels, B.J., Jørgensen, A., Kristensen, R.M. & Hansen, J.G. (2017) A dichotomous key to the genera of the marine Heterotardigrades (Tardigrada). Zootaxa, 4294, 1-45.

Head Structure

Digits

Note: If specimen has pads instead of digits, select “Pads”

Cephalic cirri flagellum form

Modified image from Renaud-Mornant 1982 0708 Renaud-Mornant J. 1982. Species Diversity in Marine Tardigrada. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on the Tardigrada. 149-178

Note: If unsure of form, select “Present”

Cephalic cirri scapus form

Modified image from Renaud-Mornant 1982 0708 Renaud-Mornant J. 1982. Species Diversity in Marine Tardigrada. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on the Tardigrada. 149-178

Note: If unsure of form, select “Present” 

Cephalic cirri cirrophore form

Modified image from Renaud-Mornant 1982 0708 Renaud-Mornant J. 1982. Species Diversity in Marine Tardigrada. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on the Tardigrada. 149-178

Note: If unsure of form, select “indistinct” for cirrophore

Secondary and tertiary clavae

Image from Fujimoto S, Hansen JG. 2019. Revision of Angursa (Arthrotardigrada: Styraconyxidae) with the description of a new species from Japan. European Journal of Taxonomy. 150: 1-19.

Note: Secondary clavae can have similar forms to primary clavae. However, secondary clavae can be flat structures of varying shapes around the mouth cone area

Generalized forms of primary clavae

Arthrotardigrada generalized primary clavae form

Note: Clavae forms can vary between species

Armoured plates?

Note: Select “Ventral plates” if visible.

Additional digit accessory structures

Arthrotardigrada digit accessory structures

Note: Specimen can have some or none of these traits. Select those that apply.

Additional claw accessory structures

Arthrotardigrada claw accessory structures

Note: Specimen can have some or none of these traits. Select those that apply.

Claw Symmetry Relative To Median Plane Of Leg?

Image from Bingemer J, Hohberg K. 2017. An illustrated identification key to the eutardigrade species (Tardigrada, Eutardigrada) presently known from European soils. Soil Organisms. 89 (3): 127-149.

Stylet Support Insertion Point As Percentage Of Buccal Tube Length

Stylet support insertion point = ss divided by Buccal tube length, as %. Note anterior measurements begin at anterior margin of stylet sheaths, ss is centred where stylet supports reach buccal tube (this requires a good dorsal or lateral view for proper measurement)

Image from Tumanov DV. 2006. Five new species of the genus Milnesium (Tardigrada, Eutardigrada, Milnesiidae). Zootaxa. 1122: 1-23.

Buccal Tube Long, Mouth At Anterior Of A Protrusible Snout

Images from Pilato G, Binda MG. 2010. Definition of families, subfamilies, genera, and subgenera of the Eutardigrada, and keys to their identification. Zootaxa. 2404: 1-54.

Pharyngeal Tube With Spiral Reinforcement

Images from Pilato G, Binda MG. 2010. Definition of families, subfamilies, genera, and subgenera of the Eutardigrada, and keys to their identification. Zootaxa. 2404: 1-54.

Peribuccal papillae?

Images from Pilato G, Binda MG. 2010. Definition of families, subfamilies, genera, and subgenera of the Eutardigrada, and keys to their identification. Zootaxa. 2404: 1-54.

(Lateral) cephalic papillae, peribuccal papillae, Milnesiidae - type claws, exceptionally wide (and usually short) buccal tube?

Cephalic image modified from Nelson DR, Guidetti R, Rebecchi L. 2009. Tardigrada. Ch. 14 in Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates, Thorp JH, Covich AP (eds.), 3rd ed.

Claw image modified from Pilato G, Binda MG. 2010. Definition of families, subfamilies, genera, and subgenera of the Eutardigrada, and keys to their identification. Zootaxa. 2404: 1-54.

Pharyngeal tube flexible?

Note: in a tardigrade with snout extended, the flex of the pharyngeal tube may not be obvious.

Images from Pilato G, Binda MG. 2010. Definition of families, subfamilies, genera, and subgenera of the Eutardigrada, and keys to their identification. Zootaxa. 2404: 1-54.

Serrated / dentate cuff / collar on legs IV

Left image from Kristensen RM. 1987. Generic revision of the Echiniscidae (Heterotardigrada), with a discussion of the origin of the family. pp. 261-335 in Bertolani R (ed). Biology of Tardigrades: Selected symposia and monographs.

Right Image from Richters F. 1926. Tardigrada. in Krumbach T. 1927. Handbuch der Zoologie, 3rd band, Walter de Gruyter & Co.

Leg sensory structures

Typically papilla on leg IV (se4 in image) and variable shape on leg I

Image from Kristensen RM. 1987. Generic revision of the Echiniscidae (Heterotardigrada), with a discussion of the origin of the family. pp. 261-335 in Bertolani R (ed). Biology of Tardigrades: Selected symposia and monographs.

Trunk appendages

Appendages (after Cirrus A) labeled according to plate … B (Scapular plate), C (First segmental plate), D (Second segmental plate), E (terminal plate). “B” is lateral, “Bd” is dorsal

Be careful! There can be great variability within a population, with individuals (especially juveniles) lacking some appendages. When in doubt, focus on other characters first!

Left image from Ramazzotti G, Maucci W. 1983. Il phylum Tardigrada(III edizione riveduta e aggiornata). English translation by C. W. Beasley, 1995. Memorie dell’ Istituto Italiano di Idrobiologia 41: 1-1012.

Right image cropped from Kristensen RM. 1987. Generic revision of the Echiniscidae (Heterotardigrada), with a discussion of the origin of the family. pp. 261-335 in Bertolani R (ed). Biology of Tardigrades: Selected symposia and monographs.

Cirrus A form

Images modified from Kristensen RM. 1987. Generic revision of the Echiniscidae (Heterotardigrada), with a discussion of the origin of the family. pp. 261-335 in Bertolani R (ed). Biology of Tardigrades: Selected symposia and monographs.

Lower image (Mopsechiniscus) modified from du Bois-Reymond Marcus E. 1944. Sobre tardigrados brasileiros. Communicaciones Zoologicas del Museo de Historia Natural de Montevideo. 1(13): 1-19 plus plates.

Terminal / caudal plate with two notches?

Images modified from Kristensen RM. 1987. Generic revision of the Echiniscidae (Heterotardigrada), with a discussion of the origin of the family. pp. 261-335 in Bertolani R (ed). Biology of Tardigrades: Selected symposia and monographs.

First image (Echiniscus) modified from Richters F. 1926. Tardigrada. in Krumbach T. 1927. Handbuch der Zoologie, 3rd band, Walter de Gruyter & Co.

Inner & outer buccal cirri present

Image modified from Nelson DR, Guidetti R, Rebecchi L. 2009. Tardigrada. Ch. 14 in Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates, Thorp JH, Covich AP (eds.), 3rd ed.

Pseudosegmental plate between last medial plate & terminal plate?

Note on 2nd image, what you see before the terminal plate is either no plate, or a full-width medial plate; don’t confuse the latter with a pseudosegmental plate!
Also, sometimes the pseudosegmental plate is paired, like segmental plates II & III. It’s still pseudosegmental!

Images from Clifford HF. 1991. Aquatic invertebrates of Alberta. University of Alberta Press, Alberta, Canada.

Segmental plates larger than intersegmental?

Image modified from Lindahl & Balser (1999), http://www.iwu.edu/~tardisdp/Keypage35.html

Any Paired Plates?

Modified from Lindahl K, Balser S.  1999. Key to tardigrade genera [Internet]. Available from: https://sun.iwu.edu/~tardisdp/Keypage33.html