Cucumibius

Genus description from Tumanov et al. 2024 (supplement): “Body surface with numerous tubercles formed by protrusions of procuticle and covered by epicuticle with intracuticular pillars. Peribuccal structures consisted of six peribuccal lobes. AISM in the shape of crests, asymmetrical with respect to the frontal plane. The dorsal apophysis consists of the following parts: (i) a relatively massive […]
Chilibius

Genus description (of Hypsibius (Isohypsibius) sculptus, with minor edits) from Ramazzotti 1962: “Lunghezza circa 200 µm. La cuticola è scolpita e presenta una granulazione estremamente fine, diffusa ovunque, anche sulla superficie ventrale. Il tubo boccale è stretto ed il suo diametro esterno è di circa 2.5 µm in un Tardigrado di 200 µm. Sempre per […]
Weglarskobius

Genus description from Kaczmarek et al. 2020: “Legs short and robust. Internal and external claws on legs I–III different in size and shape. Internal claws I–III similar to Isohypsibius type, but with long basal part (as in the genus thulinius Bertolani, 2003), and lacking accessory points (or not visible under light microscopy). External claws I–III […]
Vladimirobius

Genus description from Kaczmarek et al. 2020: “Legs long and slender. Claws of Vladimirobius type—internal claws at least two times shorter than the external claws (measured from the base of the claw), very wide at the junction of primary and secondary branches, short and thin basal part, primary branches with a very prominent gibbosity-like projection […]
Ursulinius

Genus description from Gąsiorek et al. 2019: “Cuticle covered with large, mamillose, and sculptured gibbosities. Claw bases with well-developed pseudolunulae. Double cuticular bars under claws.” Citations: Gąsiorek, P., Stec, D., Morek, W. & Michalczyk, Ł. (2019) Deceptive conservatism of claws: distinct phyletic lineages concealed within Isohypsibioidea (Eutardigrada) revealed by molecular and morphological evidence. Contributions to […]
Dianea

Genus description from Gąsiorek et al. 2019: “Cuticle with numerous small but distinct, pointy gibbosities covered with reticulum. Claw branches forking at a wide angle; claw bases without pseudolunulae. No cuticular bars under claws.” Citations: Gąsiorek, P., Stec, D., Morek, W. & Michalczyk, Ł. (2019) Deceptive conservatism of claws: distinct phyletic lineages concealed within Isohypsibioidea […]
Isohypsibiidae

Isohypsibiidae from Marley et al. 2011: “Isohypsibioidea. Claw pairs of similar size and shape. External and internal claws exhibiting articulation (the basal section and secondary branch form a solid unit while the primary branch and secondary branch articulate). Claws Isohypsibius-type, forming a right-angle between basal section and secondary branch. AISM ridge-like.” Family redescription from Gąsiorek et […]
Isohypsibius

Genus description from Thulin 1928: “Krallen vom zweiten Typus. Für die von mir beobachteten Arten gilt ferner, dass die Muskelfortsätze am vorderen Teile der Mundröhre crista-förmig sind (bei undulatus, septentrionalis und Sattleri konnte dies jedoch nicht sicher festgestellt werden). Weiter ist bei ihnen der hinter dem vierten Bauchganglion inserierende Transversalmuskel jeder Seite einfach oder aus 2-3 dicht aneinander verlaufenden […]
Fractonotus

Genus description from Pilato 1998: “Microhypsibiidae; paired elliptical organ present on the head; buccal tube rigid; ventral lamina absent. Dorsal and ventral apophyses for the insertion of the stylet muscles asymmetrical with respect to the frontal plane; the dorsal apophyses split into two clearly distinct portions: the anterior portion is a stumpy hook with a […]
Eremobiotus

Genus description from Biserov 1992: “Six peribuccal papulae and six peribuccal lobes present; buccal lamellae absent. Bucco-pharyngeal apparatus of Isohypsibius type. The first three pairs of legs with two double claws of similar size, Isohypsibius type but with very wide (about 180°) angle between the primary and secondary branches, at any rate in internal claws.The fourth pair of legs […]